![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
|
|
Transition Plan for the Implementation of NCATE 2000 Standards The Unit Accreditation Board has identified the following levels at which the first two standards must be addressed at the time of a unit's on-site visit. A plan of the unit's assessment system is required in the first year that the standards are effective. Greater implementation of the assessment system is required in each subsequent year. The following specific requirements will apply to units whose visits are in the semesters identified below. These yearly requirements apply to units undergoing initial and continuing accreditation. All units should follow a similar schedule for the development and implementation of their assessment systems, regardless ofthe date of their next on-site visit by a Board of Examiners team. Institutions with Visits in Fall 2001 and Spring 2001 At a minimum, units with visits scheduled during fall 2001 and spring 2002 should have a well-developed plan for an assessment system that includes timelines and details about the system components. The plan should have been developed collaboratively by members of the professional community. The plan should provide a detailed description of the unit's design for collecting, analyzing, summarizing, and using candidate assessment information. It should include evaluation measures of outcomes that will provide evidence of candidate proficiencies in professional, state, and institutional standards. These standards and assessments should be clearly communicated to candidates. In addition, the plan should include provisions for data collection so that the unit is able to:
The plan should clearly identify the types of assessments that will be used by the unit and at what point in the unit's programs the major assessments will occur. NCATE expects units to employ multiple assessments. Examples of assessments include reflections, observations, teaching demonstrations, analytic work, student projects, and other forms of evaluative information demonstrating proficiency. The plan should also indicate the sources of the assessment information. Some information will come from internal assessments and other information will come from external sources. In addition to the plan of the assessment system, the unit should have available any performance assessment data that are currently being collected. These data might include assessments conducted internally by the unit and external data such as results of state licensing tests. Institutions with Visits in Fall 2001 & Spring 2003 At a minimum, the unit is implementing the first steps of its assessment system. It has developed collaboratively with the professional community some internal performance assessments based on professional, state, and institutional standards. Rubrics/criteria for scoring and tests for accuracy, consistency, and fairness are being developed and some data collection efforts have been initiated. In addition to implementing the first steps of its assessment system, the unit should have available any performance assessment data that are currently being collected. These data might include assessments conducted internally by the unit and external data such as results of state licensing tests. Institutions with Visits in Fall 2003 and Spring 2004 At a minimum, the unit is in the second year of implementing its assessment plan. The unit is using internal performance assessment based on professional, state, and institutional standards to identify the competence of all candidates. A system for testing the accuracy, consistency, and fairness of the assessments has been developed and data management and analysis have begun. In addition to implementing second year activities outlined in its assessment system, the unit should have available any performance assessment data that are currently being collected. These data might include assessments conducted internally by the unit and external data such as results of state licensing tests. Institutions with Visits in Fall 2004 & Spring 2005 The unit's assessment system is being implemented, evaluated, and refined. Performance assessments are being tested for accuracy, consistency, and fairness. Data on candidate performance from external and internal measurements have been compiled and are being used to improve programs. Reference: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (2001). Professional Standards for the Accreditation of Schools, Colleges, and Departments of Education, Washington DC: Author. | ||||||
| ||||||||